Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor Recounts Balaclava-Wearing Stalker Chase at Sandringham Estate

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor testified that he was chased by an alleged stalker wearing a balaclava near his Norfolk estate.

3 dk okuma 9 görüntülenme
andrew mountbatten-windsor

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor told a court he encountered an alleged stalker wearing a balaclava who chased after him near his Sandringham home in Norfolk. The incident occurred on 6 May, and authorities are pursuing both criminal charges and a civil stalking protection order against the suspect, 39-year-old Alex Jenkinson from Stowmarket, Suffolk.

İçindekiler

The Encounter

During the Westminster Magistrates' Court hearing, Deputy Chief Magistrate Tan Ikram read portions of Mountbatten-Windsor's witness statement describing the confrontation. The former duke said he was walking his dogs on the estate when he spotted a vehicle he believed belonged to press photographers. After driving past the car with his security detail, Mountbatten-Windsor reported that a man wearing a balaclava face covering turned and faced him. He described the individual as "out-of-place" and noted that a loose dog was running nearby. Once the man recognized Mountbatten-Windsor's identity, he began sprinting after the vehicle.

Jenkinson, from Stowmarket, faces two charges: a public order offense for causing the royal to fear unlawful violence, and a second charge relating to threatening, abusive, or insulting behavior connected to another incident involving a man named Stephen Terry in King's Lynn on 5 May. The defendant denies both allegations and is contesting the stalking protection order application. Suffolk Police provided evidence to support their civil application, including phone searches and testimony from Mountbatten-Windsor.

The trial is scheduled to begin on 21 December. Jenkinson, who is currently on conditional bail, faces strict restrictions: he cannot approach Sandringham, Buckingham Palace, Balmoral, Windsor, or Highgrove, and is forbidden from making direct or indirect contact with Mountbatten-Windsor or entering Norfolk.

Court Complications

Thursday's hearing proceeded in Jenkinson's absence after court officials barred him from entering the building because he had brought his dog, Indie. His lawyer, Claire Howell, explained that Jenkinson is homeless and currently residing in temporary hotel accommodation, and that the dog serves as a support animal due to his ADHD. However, Judge Ikram expressed skepticism, noting he would require documentation to corroborate medical claims or support animal certification. Howell subsequently confirmed that temporary accommodation has been arranged where Jenkinson can leave the dog for future court appearances.

Who is Alex Jenkinson?+
Alex Jenkinson is a 39-year-old man from Stowmarket, Suffolk, charged with public order offenses related to incidents involving Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor and another individual named Stephen Terry. He is currently homeless and residing in temporary accommodation.
What specific charges does Jenkinson face?+
Jenkinson is charged with using threatening, abusive, or insulting words or behavior with intent to cause fear or provoke unlawful violence. Suffolk Police are also applying for a civil Stalking Protection Order against him. He denies both the criminal charge and the order application.
What are the terms of Jenkinson's bail?+
Jenkinson is prohibited from approaching Sandringham, Buckingham Palace, Balmoral, Windsor, or Highgrove. He cannot contact Mountbatten-Windsor directly or indirectly, cannot approach him, and is forbidden from entering Norfolk entirely.
When will the trial begin?+
The trial is scheduled to begin on 21 December at Westminster Magistrates' Court. Mountbatten-Windsor's witness statement is expected to form the centerpiece of both the criminal and civil proceedings.
Why was Jenkinson barred from court on Thursday?+
Court officials did not permit Jenkinson to enter the building because he had brought his dog. While his lawyer argued the animal provides support due to his ADHD, the judge noted he would require proper documentation to verify the claim rather than accepting the explanation alone.

Bülten Aboneliği

Haftada bir, teknoloji ve dijital dünyadan seçtiklerimiz e-postanda. Spam yok, sadece içerik.

Benzer Haberler

Yorumlar

0
Henüz yorum yok. İlk yorumu sen yap!
app store'da indir