Meta Ordered to Pay $942 Million Total in New Mexico Child Safety Case
A New Mexico judge ordered Meta to pay $567 million to address child safety harms on its platforms. Meta has stated its intention to appeal both verdicts.

A New Mexico court has ordered Meta to pay $567 million into a dedicated fund addressing harm to children's mental health on its platforms, following a landmark trial that found the company knowingly concealed information about child sexual exploitation. Combined with a $375 million penalty imposed earlier in the case, Meta now faces a total judgment of $942 million—the largest penalty the company has received related to child safety concerns.
İçindekiler ›
Court Findings and Remediation Fund
Judge Bryan Biedscheid directed that $420 million of the new penalty be allocated toward mental health treatment services for young people in New Mexico over the next five years. The remaining funds will support awareness campaigns, prevention initiatives, and screening services. The judge characterized Meta as a "public nuisance" comparable to air pollution, stating the company's platforms produce "psychological harm and sexual exploitation of children" as a byproduct of their business model.
The March trial marked the first instance in which Meta was held liable for harm occurring on its platforms. A jury determined the company knowingly damaged children's mental health while concealing what it knew about child sexual abuse. The second phase of the trial, which concluded with Thursday's ruling, focused on implementing safeguards and remediation measures.
Court-Ordered Changes and Challenges
Judge Biedscheid mandated several operational changes, including requirements that Facebook and Instagram display informational banners explaining protection features and safety tools. The court also ordered an educational awareness campaign within New Mexico, subject to state oversight. However, the court declined to impose age-verification requirements for children under 13, citing federal privacy law restrictions and noting that singling out Meta for such verification while other platforms remain unregulated would be inequitable.
Meta has stated its intention to appeal both verdicts. The company's statement emphasized that it "works hard to keep people safe" and disputed characterizations in the lawsuit. Company revenue reached $61 billion in the second quarter alone—a 28 percent increase year-over-year—suggesting the financial impact of the judgment remains modest relative to overall business performance.
Broader Legal Landscape
The New Mexico case originated from a 2023 lawsuit brought by state attorneys, following a Guardian investigation revealing how Facebook and Instagram had become marketplaces for child sex trafficking. Several former Meta content moderators disclosed that they had flagged harmful material related to child grooming, but such cases were not escalated through proper channels. Meta currently faces thousands of additional lawsuits across the United States on similar grounds, and earlier this year lost a landmark Los Angeles case establishing the company could be held liable for designing addictive platforms.
What is the total amount Meta must pay in this case?+
How will the $567 million penalty be used?+
Why did the court reject age verification for children under 13?+
Is this the first time Meta has been held liable for platform harms?+
Will Meta accept this ruling or challenge it?+
Bülten Aboneliği
Haftada bir, teknoloji ve dijital dünyadan seçtiklerimiz e-postanda. Spam yok, sadece içerik.


